Ten delivery cases, three honest ways to explain them.

The lens may change for an executive, reader, or operator. The underlying facts, dates, outcomes, and evidence boundaries do not.

This English page is deliberately the case index: every case keeps its claim, outcome, and boundary in one card. The full ten-case narratives live on the Chinese page; the English deep-dive evidence is the controlled-recovery case.

Why–What–How

Lead with the risk or business problem, define the result, then show the controlled method.

Story

Use tension, decision, and consequence—but never turn an unobserved outcome into a dramatic ending.

5W2H

Make owner, scope, time, place, reason, method, and measured boundary explicit.

Coverage and evidence responsibility

Each case keeps its source facts, measured outcome, and claim boundary while the lens changes how the reader enters the story.

01 · MyCodexEnv

High-risk Git and worktree governance

Value: preserve user assets while restoring a safe continuation point.

Boundary: successful Git recovery did not authorize runtime writes.

02 · Job application

Agentic Engineer CV

Value: produce a readable, role-specific two-page artifact.

Evidence: page, link, residual-text, and visual checks.

03 · MyCodexEnv

Simplifying DHF safely

Value: make light work lighter without deleting safety controls.

Evidence: contract, committee review, implementation, and gate.

04 · Proof Center

Commercial positioning

Value: connect one buyer, one service, and bounded proof.

Boundary: strategy evidence did not prove customer adoption.

05 · ONEART

Private response prototype

Value: test useful interaction while minimizing collected data.

Boundary: local prototype, no production deployment.

06 · ShipQ

Level 2 adapter and rollback

Value: contain partial external writes and restore trustworthy state.

Evidence: failed receipt, native rollback, independent readback.

07 · Committee review

10/10 still incomplete

Value: prevent self-review confidence from replacing independent proof.

Boundary: blind final remained unresolved when rounds ended.

08 · SimonSays

231 requests are not visitors

Value: avoid treating probes and bot noise as growth.

Boundary: visitor count unavailable when RUM was stale.

09 · Public DHF

Status documentation and browser QA

Value: separate source, runtime, publication, and enforcement claims.

Evidence: focused tests and desktop/375px acceptance.

10 · Startup4Chinese

Moments delivery contract

Value: separate verified event, generated asset, and observed use.

Boundary: repository push did not prove WeChat publication.

Evidence rule: narrative structure can make a case understandable. It cannot increase the evidence level of the case.